🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."